The cost of care.
justen:podcast
The increasing cost of healthcare in America can be attributed to a number of causes, but for many of us, the growing presence of computers at our doctor's offices adds more to our monthly premiums
than we might care to know about. Kaiser Permanente is on track to spend over $2.6 billion this year on information technology, with about $825 million of that going directly towards our
HealthConnect e...
read more
The increasing cost of healthcare in America can be attributed to a number of causes, but for many of us, the growing presence of computers at our doctor's offices adds more to our monthly premiums
than we might care to know about. Kaiser Permanente is on track to spend over $2.6 billion this year on information technology, with about $825 million of that going directly towards our
HealthConnect electronic health record project. That comes out to about $302 per member, or about 7.7 percent of our estimated total revenue per member. HealthConnect alone accounts for about $96 per
member of that total. To put those costs into perspective, we can look at the Veterans Health Administration, widely recognized as a leader in information technology in healthcare. At Kaiser
Permanente, we often point out that HealthConnect would be "the largest civilian deployment of an electronic health record." In fact, today, the largest electronic health record deployment in America
can be found at the VA. Like Kaiser Permanente, the VA is considered a much more efficient healthcare delivery system in the United States. This year, the effective cost, per member, for care at KP
will be about $3,918. At the VA, the total cost, per patient will be about $5,388. For comparison, the national average will be about $6,300. And, when it comes to information technology, the
benefits of the VA's technology approach are clear. Wyatt Andrews, with the CBS Evening News, recently reported (video) on the substantial progress being made throughout the VA medical system.
Andrews reported: "In studies, including one by Harvard, and in six straight years of patient satisfaction surveys, the VA earned the highest health care quality rating in the country." Remember,
Kaiser Permanente will spend $2.6 billion this year on information technology, or about $302 per member. At the VA, their total will come in at only $1.6 billion, or $296 per member. In contrast, the
VA's electronic health record system, VistA, compared to HealthConnect, is available in more than twice the number of facilities and is accessible, today, by 8,000 more physicians. To better
understand the efficiencies of the VA system, keep in mind that the VA has 163 medical centers, over 800 clinics, 135 nursing homes, and over 180,000 medical personnel and staff, virtually all of
which utilize the VistA system. By contrast, Kaiser Permanente has 37 medical centers, 400 medical offices, and nearly 162,000 physicians and staff. Only three of our medical centers can use
HealthConnect to a similar extent to which the VA utilizes VistA, and only about half of our physicians currently have access to HealthConnect, compared, again, to effectively all of the VA's
hospitals, clinics, and physicians having access to VistA. When it comes to efficiency, it is not often that we can look to the United States government for inspiration, let alone examples. But the
VA is one case where we at Kaiser Permanente, and healthcare in general, can turn to for advice and guidance.
read less
Download this podcast
Latest Episodes for this Channel
Mon December 11 2006
The increasing cost of healthcare in America can be attributed to a number of causes, but for many of us, the growing presence of computers at our doc...
read more
The increasing cost of healthcare in America can be attributed to a number of causes, but for many of us, the growing presence of computers at our doctor's offices adds more to our monthly premiums
than we might care to know about. Kaiser Permanente is on track to spend over $2.6 billion this year on information technology, with about $825 million of that going directly towards our
HealthConnect e...
read more
The increasing cost of healthcare in America can be attributed to a number of causes, but for many of us, the growing presence of computers at our doctor's offices adds more to our monthly premiums
than we might care to know about. Kaiser Permanente is on track to spend over $2.6 billion this year on information technology, with about $825 million of that going directly towards our
HealthConnect electronic health record project. That comes out to about $302 per member, or about 7.7 percent of our estimated total revenue per member. HealthConnect alone accounts for about $96 per
member of that total. To put those costs into perspective, we can look at the Veterans Health Administration, widely recognized as a leader in information technology in healthcare. At Kaiser
Permanente, we often point out that HealthConnect would be "the largest civilian deployment of an electronic health record." In fact, today, the largest electronic health record deployment in America
can be found at the VA. Like Kaiser Permanente, the VA is considered a much more efficient healthcare delivery system in the United States. This year, the effective cost, per member, for care at KP
will be about $3,918. At the VA, the total cost, per patient will be about $5,388. For comparison, the national average will be about $6,300. And, when it comes to information technology, the
benefits of the VA's technology approach are clear. Wyatt Andrews, with the CBS Evening News, recently reported (video) on the substantial progress being made throughout the VA medical system.
Andrews reported: "In studies, including one by Harvard, and in six straight years of patient satisfaction surveys, the VA earned the highest health care quality rating in the country." Remember,
Kaiser Permanente will spend $2.6 billion this year on information technology, or about $302 per member. At the VA, their total will come in at only $1.6 billion, or $296 per member. In contrast, the
VA's electronic health record system, VistA, compared to HealthConnect, is available in more than twice the number of facilities and is accessible, today, by 8,000 more physicians. To better
understand the efficiencies of the VA system, keep in mind that the VA has 163 medical centers, over 800 clinics, 135 nursing homes, and over 180,000 medical personnel and staff, virtually all of
which utilize the VistA system. By contrast, Kaiser Permanente has 37 medical centers, 400 medical offices, and nearly 162,000 physicians and staff. Only three of our medical centers can use
HealthConnect to a similar extent to which the VA utilizes VistA, and only about half of our physicians currently have access to HealthConnect, compared, again, to effectively all of the VA's
hospitals, clinics, and physicians having access to VistA. When it comes to efficiency, it is not often that we can look to the United States government for inspiration, let alone examples. But the
VA is one case where we at Kaiser Permanente, and healthcare in general, can turn to for advice and guidance.
read less
Fri December 08 2006
California Attorney General Bill Lockyer and Hewlett-Packard yesterday announced that they have reached a settlement, which will likely end the Attorn...
read more
California Attorney General Bill Lockyer and Hewlett-Packard yesterday announced that they have reached a settlement, which will likely end the Attorney General's investigation into the role the
company and its remaining directors and officers played in HP's identity and privacy ethical failures. The company will pay $13.5 million, "hire an independent director, and expand the duties of its
chief ...
read more
California Attorney General Bill Lockyer and Hewlett-Packard yesterday announced that they have reached a settlement, which will likely end the Attorney General's investigation into the role the
company and its remaining directors and officers played in HP's identity and privacy ethical failures. The company will pay $13.5 million, "hire an independent director, and expand the duties of its
chief ethics officer and chief privacy officer." The Attorney General's case against HP did only involve a civil complaint, so it likely would have ultimately ended up with a financial settlement and
some sort of compromised "corrective" measures like we see here, but I really think this is an injustice for the people who had their identities and privacy compromised, and for HP shareholders in
the long run. The evidence that senior executives at HP, potentially including Mark Hurd, either ignored or were ignorant of the ongoing, "probably illegal" actions is pretty well documented, and
pretty overwhelming. Patricia Dunn took much of the public blame for this, and that's unfortunate for her and for HP. It seems to me like she should have had a better grip on what was happening at
HP, but it doesn't seem to me like she should have been the only one with that responsibility. A full, objective, and independent investigation should have been the first thing on everybody's list.
Instead, this case is now settled, Congress has moved on, and Dunn will be focussed on proving her innocence. The unfortunate thing for Mark Hurd is that his level of responsibility and
accountability wasn't determined in this process. The second HP hits a performance blip, this scandal will be the first thing on every shareholder's mind when they're thinking of who to blame. When
that day comes, I would not want to be in Mark Hurd's shoes.
read less
Wed December 06 2006
When I woke up, on the morning of November 3, I did not know how that day would end. I did know that the stability and integrity of Kaiser Permanente,...
read more
When I woke up, on the morning of November 3, I did not know how that day would end. I did know that the stability and integrity of Kaiser Permanente, an organization I believe in, was being
challenged. Later that afternoon, the organization began notifying the first of our employees that their positions were being eliminated. Kaiser Permanente is a good organization. Our values do not
include dis...
read more
When I woke up, on the morning of November 3, I did not know how that day would end. I did know that the stability and integrity of Kaiser Permanente, an organization I believe in, was being
challenged. Later that afternoon, the organization began notifying the first of our employees that their positions were being eliminated. Kaiser Permanente is a good organization. Our values do not
include disregarding the livelihood of our employees, so unnecessarily. Our employees, those employees are people who are committed to their work, people who believe in what our organization stands
for, people who care for our members. It is unfathomable to me that so many of our resources are being allowed to be depleted, unnecessarily. It is unconscionable to me that we are so carelessly
disregarding the livelihood of our colleagues, our friends, to try and compensate for those missing resources. I never could have imagined that November 3 would end the way it did. I could never have
imagined the way our organization would respond, to me, to these issues. It goes against every single one of our principles. Still, given every disappointment over the past month, there are too many
people who now know, who care. People who are now engaged. People who are protecting Kaiser Permanente. People who will stand up to challenges to our integrity, our reputation, our principles. I know
that there are thousands of people, where I work, doing the most amazing things everyday. They are good people, people who do what they do because they believe in their work, and many of them,
because they believe in Kaiser Permanente. I believe in Kaiser Permanente. Troubles are a blessing that force you to change, to believe. Maya Angelou.
read less
Mon November 27 2006
Since November 3, I have received thousands of messages from my colleagues across Kaiser Permanente, as well as hundreds from other concerned individu...
read more
Since November 3, I have received thousands of messages from my colleagues across Kaiser Permanente, as well as hundreds from other concerned individuals. Your messages of support have meant more to
me than you can imagine. Those of you who offered helpful information, thank you. Many of you have asked important questions, and I apologize that I cannot respond to each message individually.
However...
read more
Since November 3, I have received thousands of messages from my colleagues across Kaiser Permanente, as well as hundreds from other concerned individuals. Your messages of support have meant more to
me than you can imagine. Those of you who offered helpful information, thank you. Many of you have asked important questions, and I apologize that I cannot respond to each message individually.
However, I will try, here, to answer the most common questions, to the best of my ability. HealthConnect questions Do you believe HealthConnect is a mistake? I believe that Kaiser Permanente must
have a sustainable, workable plan for implementing electronic health records. Unfortunately, outages of our current HealthConnect systems have increased from 9,188 user hours of downtime in June 2006
to 59,142 hours by the end of October 2006, a 543% surge. (For comparison, the average concurrent user count has only increased 25%, from 8,741 to 10,954.) The level of downtime we are seeing is
unacceptable for a mission critical environment like healthcare, regardless of the cause of those outages. Our physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and receptionists need to have systems supporting them
that function reliably, so that they can provide the care our members deserve. HealthConnect is a necessary mission for our organization, but we must be open and honest with ourselves and our vendors
about the issues we are facing, so that we can begin work on fixing these problems. Is this downtime the fault of Epic or Citrix? The issues we are seeing with HealthConnect are the result of an
ongoing and worsening series of failures encompassing all aspects of the Kaiser Permanente information technology infrastructure, including the infrastructure that has been put into place
specifically to support HealthConnect. No single vendor can be responsible for the entirety of the downtime we are experiencing. What do you believe will be the next steps for the HealthConnect
project? In his response to these concerns, George Halvorson stated his belief that “time” will allow the HealthConnect project to function reliably and properly and “prove the
point beyond debate.” Unfortunately, neither our physicians, nurses, nor our members, have the luxury of time when critical care could depend on HealthConnect functioning properly. The 543%
increase in downtime since June is unacceptable. We must begin working with Epic, Citrix, and our other vendors in a frank and transparent manner, and fully understand how we can overcome these
issues before we move forward with any further deployments of HealthConnect. In the interim, we cannot depend on HealthConnect in any potentially critical situation. We must stop marketing
HealthConnect and start properly engineering it. General questions What is your position with Kaiser Permanente? My employee badge reads “Projects Manager, Education and Training,”
although that title provides little description of my actual responsibilities. My department, (Employee) Education and Training is affiliated with the (Member) Health Education department, and a
portion of my responsibilities involve developing curriculum and publications for both employee development and training, as well as member health education. I am not directly involved in the
clerical tracking of employee training program completion, although I do oversee the information technology operations supporting those regulatory responsibilities and staff. What is your involvement
with HealthConnect? I do not work on the project directly. Within the employee training programs area of my responsibilities, I have developed training materials and assisted in the development of
the training curriculum supporting the project. From an information technology standpoint, I have worked on projects to modernize several member information systems, and I have worked on developing
the interfaces between those systems and HealthConnect systems...
read less
Fri November 03 2006
If you had worked at Enron, WorldCom, or Qwest prior to their self-destruction, and if you had known about the issues that brought those organizations...
read more
If you had worked at Enron, WorldCom, or Qwest prior to their self-destruction, and if you had known about the issues that brought those organizations down, you would have had a responsibility to do
something to try and fix whatever was wrong. I believe that there's something inhumane about standing by while people lose their jobs, their pensions, their livelihood. I'm human.
If you had worked at Enron, WorldCom, or Qwest prior to their self-destruction, and if you had known about the issues that brought those organizations down, you would have had a responsibility to do
something to try and fix whatever was wrong. I believe that there's something inhumane about standing by while people lose their jobs, their pensions, their livelihood. I'm human.
read less